Foundations of Social Science Methods

Summer 2008

Austin

 

Tentative Study Guide For Exam One

 

·         What is ontology?  What is epistemology?  What are the different ways of organizing social scientific knowledge?

·         According to Babbie, the foundation of science is that scientists study patterns of things and events, or what are called regularities, and that scientists study collections of things, or aggregates.

·         As we have seen, drawing conclusions from limited observations is the error of overgeneralization, while ignoring those cases that do not fit our predetermined pattern of thinking/opinion is the error of selective observation.  What are other errors of human inquiry?

·         An exhaustive study of the inner workings of a gang is an example of the idiographic method. What are examples of the nomothetic method?

·         When the logic of data analysis moves from the particular/concrete to the general/abstract, we call this the inductive method.  What is the procedure of the deductive method?

·         What is “strong objectivity,” according to Sandra Harding?  What is her basic argument concerning the depoliticization of science?

·         Be prepared to diagram and explain (1) the wheel of science,  (2) the two-by-two table of intersecting domains of knowledge (be prepared to provide examples), and (3) the steps from theory to hypothesis testing through operationalization.

·         According to Babbie, the use of deception in social science research, although not automatically ruled out, is always to be carefully considered. There are serious ethical questions with the use of deception.  If deception is used, what must followed?  What are other ethical concerns?  What is Nuremberg?  What are abuses of science discussed in class?

·         According to Diesing, the internalist view of social science argues that social science is an autonomous institution with its own values of objectivity and neutrality. Hence, political influences come from outside the institution.  How is this different from the externalist view?

·         Technocratic science is that type of science that Diesing claims benefits corporations, the state, and the military.  What is the other type of science Diesing identifies?  What would it take to make this possible?

·         Babbie says that a researcher observes confidentiality when the identity of the participant is known to her/him but kept secret from the public.  How is this different from anonymity?

·         According to Babbie, ethical standards refer not only to physical harm but also to mental (and emotional) harm.

·         A paradigm is a fundamental model or frame of reference used to organize our observations and reasoning.  What is the difference between a paradigm and a theory?  What do we mean when we say paradigms shift and why does this happen?

·         A variable is a special kind of concept comprised of a set of attributes.

·         According to structural functionalism, a social entity, such as an organization, is viewed as an organism, in that it is made up of parts, each of which contributes to the working of the whole. What are the other major sociological “paradigms”?  What are their key elements?

·         A hypothesis is a specified testable expectation about empirical reality that follows from a more general proposition.  How is this different from an axiom?

·         The procedure where a researcher constructs a theory by observing aspects of social life and searching for patterns that may point to universal principles is the inductive method. Grounded theory is a type of inductive method.  What are some of the other ones types of inductive methods?

·         The empirical case/unit a researcher observes and measures is the unit of analysis.  What is the unit of observation? It is always the same as the unit of analysis?  If not, what would an exception look like?

·         There are three types of longitudinal studies identified by Babbie: trend, panel, and cohort.  What is the difference between these methods?

·         It is faulty reasoning to draw conclusions about individuals from aggregate (group-level) data. This error is called the ecological fallacy.  What is the reverse of this error?

·         The following error in causal reasoning involves interpreting individual behavior only in terms of the researcher’s point of view: Provincialism.  What are other errors of causal reasoning?

·         Of the observer roles, the only one that potentially leaves a social situation unaffected by the researcher is the complete observer.  What are other observer roles?

·         In the method of ethnomethodology, breaching experiments are used to test hypotheses about the tenacity of the social order. 

·         Of the qualitative methods, content analysis relies most heavily on recorded human communications.  What are other the other major qualitative research methods?

·         According to Skocpol, among the three logics of comparative history, the method of contrast of context is least associated with causal analysis.  What are the other logics of comparative history?

·         According to Babbie, qualitative research answers questions that escape the scope of survey techniques or laboratory observation.  Is this a true statement?

·         According to Babbie, qualitative analysis is the nonnumerical examination and interpretation of observations.  Is this a true statement?

·         According to Babbie, qualitative analysis involves a continual interplay between theory and analysis.  Is this a true statement?

·         Grounded theory rests on the constant comparative method.  What is the analytic induction method?  What is domain analysis?

·         What is sufficient and necessary causation?  What is the difference?