Getting to Know UW-Green Bay Conversations with Chancellor Shepard:
Academic Staff General Assembly
December 12, 2001

Get to Know: Home

Chancellor: Home

UW-Green Bay: Home

What have you sensed in the community?
The Chancellor replied that what he is hearing is positive.  The community wants the University to be more engaged.  We’re already reaching out, but we need to market what we do.

We’re seeing what you do by design.  You're meeting with alumni and the community.  That hasn't been done much in the past. 

What about the State budget situation?  $100,000 off the top - a $65,000 lapse - a $37,000 lapse.  Agencies are being cut.  UWS being cut 3 1/2%.  I'm aware that we're part of the solution to the state's economic situation.  The structural deficit has been in place for several years.  Are you planning ahead?
The Chancellor replied, "yes."  The University's contingency fund has been hit to meet required reductions to date.  That money had been identified to buy computers, etc.  We're working to diversify revenues. 
If the institution is to grow with the support to do so, one strategy is to grow.  If we can, say, reach 7,500 over a decade, being funded at average cost, that will create "economies of scale," freeing up funds to go to direct support of student learning.  Several campuses, last time around, followed that strategy very successfully.  We chose a different route.  One thing is clear, we will not receive more funding to do what we are already doing.

With regard to FAIRNIS, what's been done with the results?

The Chancellor said it would be helpful if we secured resources.  We’re below where we should be as compared to other UWS institutions.  GPR is below by about $3 million.  Instruction is down the most at about $1.3 million.  We're checking to see what's happened and where the dollars are.  FAIRNIS may help us understand needs on our campus if more resources become available; it is not a lever or strategy for obtaining the requisite resources.

What's happened to the all-faculty resolution whereby the entire $500,000 would go to faculty?
The Chancellor stated that the first priority is student success; the second is demanding excellence of students and ourselves.  A positive of the Learning Experience is that it integrates in and out of the classroom experience.

Students of color, how are they doing?

The Chancellor replied, "superbly."  They are very positive in their experiences here.  Mentioned the program he attended a few days and about how pleased he was to see the numbers in attendance, including the number of people in the audience.  It is critical to our success to diversity students and faculty populations.  International students add a great dimension.  They'd like to engage more with other students. 
Years ago, when Zeke Backes was here, there was funding available for safety items.  Now, safety items are on the backburner.  They had been acquired via grants, but that's also disappeared.  We’re facing safety issues now.  How do we go about getting funding?
The Chancellor stated that the normal budget process should address these issues; there is competition for dollars.  Need to look at the margins to do things differently.  Each unit needs goals and objectives.  We'll work on this over time.

I'm academic staff and faculty staff.  What's your take on working together and suggestions to improve? 
The Chancellor said that it's in your hands to improve.  Academic staff leadership and faculty leadership want to work more closely with each other.  Need to take a constitutional look at governance - perhaps an assembly that includes both faculty and academic staff.  Need to look for opportunities for collaboration.  The groups should figure out what's best for them.  Need to continually educate each other.
What do you think of our governance/committee structure?
The Chancellor mentioned that it can always change and do better.  Some committees are reporting to the Provost when perhaps it should be faculty governance.  The reliance upon "extra-governmental" task forces could well be a necessary response to a "separate but equal" governance structure.  The way the campus approached the Learning Experience illustrates; it cuts across the governance structure.  

Have you looked at the administrative structure - it seems to be top heavy?
The Chancellor talked about growing to 7500 students without making a significant investment in changing the administrative structure.  In the area of development, we are spending money to make money.  The rule of thumb is that you invest $1 to get back $10.

The events of September 11 could affect enrollment.  Are you willing to work with outreach to get us in the public eye?

The Chancellor replied that some of our numbers look soft.  Being where people are is important.  We need to use the expertise in outreach with other than instruction.

Any thoughts on the direction we should go?  We’re an 8 to 4:30 pm. kind of operation.  It's difficult to offer programs we'd like to offer, there are student life programs we'd like to offer.
The Chancellor stated that he hears from students that we're a suitcase campus. 
The Chancellor stated the Mayor has told him that there are plans to push development toward campus.  What are your thoughts?
It's a double edge sword.  Now, we have things we can point to that make us different.  We'll loose some students, but we'll also gain some.  

TOP OF PAGE Office of the Chancellor, David A. Cofrin Library, Suite 810, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay,
2420 Nicolet Drive,
Green Bay,WI 54311-7001 
Phone 920-465-2207
Comments to: Chancellor Web Manager
Revised 1/8/03