Office of the Chancellor

 

E-mail message to the Campus
February 18, 2003

REMARKS AND ESSAYS:
Report following the Governor's budget address

Colleagues:
I am sure many were tuned in to hear Governor Doyle's address last night. UW System was the Governor's "poster child" for budgetary pain.
     Wisconsin faces a budget deficit the likes of which we have never seen before. And, Governor Doyle has proposed a cut for the UW System that is larger than our world class system has ever before experienced. The UW System budget would be cut, over the biennium, by $250 million in State GPR funding.
     The amount is staggering, equal to the entire combined GPR budgets of UWGB, UW-Platteville, UW-River Falls, and all 13 UW Colleges in the first year of the biennium; add in all state support for UW-Milwaukee in year two of the biennium, and we just begin to reach the $250M mark. And, this comes after absorbing, this year, a budget reduction of $52M in state support.
     We had expected that the approach to addressing the State's budget problem would be characterized by fairness. The very real structural deficit is the result of a series of programmatic commitments and tax cuts for which long-term finance was not really available. Come time to face the music, and the proposal is to cut from other areas, principally higher education. And, it is not simply that the "make up" is coming from areas not responsible for the structural deficit problem. On top of that inequity, higher education gets a disproportionate cut. The GPR budget for the entire UW System comprises 9.3% of total State GPR; Governor Doyle has proposed a budget for the next biennium that has us taking 38% of the actual GPR cuts in the Governor's budget.
     So, what will the impact be for our campus? I am told that, given past experiences, it will be several weeks before we have the system-level number disaggregated to campus-based cuts. However, there is no way to put a gloss on this. And, we certainly should not do so. Our capacity to serve our region and our students is going to be seriously reduced.
     Just how seriously depends upon two things: the fate of a tuition/financial aid package included in the Governor's budget and just what happens as the Legislature deliberates on and acts upon the budget.
     The tuition/financial aid package, as painful as it will be for our students, is essential if we are to remain part of the long-term solution to Wisconsin's economic challenges. Without the offset, as a system we would lose several thousand faculty and staff and, thereby, the capacity to serve more than twenty thousand students. With the offset, serious reductions remain but not of such a staggering magnitude.
     As we think about the legislative phase, the Governor's budget, as bleak as it is, is likely the best outcome we can hope for. It will be a fight to protect it. It will be a political fight.
     The political scientist in me cannot help but point out the political dimension. Looking at the overall proposed budget - who got cut, who did not - and one sees a topographical map of the political power centers in Wisconsin. There is the K-12 mountain range and various other ridges and peaks. And, the contour lines as clearly demark the higher education sink hole.
     We must effectively organize to influence our democratic form of government. Goodness knows we have tried. Participation in the most recent effort (Friends of Higher Education) was very disappointing. There is a lesson here for the longer term, though: expecting to be supported for simply doing well is not how it works; we must be willing to join together in organizations designed to fight for what we know to be critical to the future of our State.
     Opportunities will begin soon. President Lyall and the Regents propose to hold a series of budget hearings throughout the State and over the next six weeks. They will be assessing the budget choices that each campus faces.
     We certainly will be heard.
     The Governor's budget plan gives us a starting place. At UWGB, we will be engaging in a budget process that focuses upon the budget as proposed by the Governor. We will likely consider several scenarios connected to what may or may not happen concerning tuition. Expect some of these scenarios to be bleak indeed.
     I do hope that, in the end, the leadership of the State will find approaches to protect their long investment in a University of Wisconsin system that is the door to brighter futures for the whole State. Hope alone will not make that happen. Certainly, the Governor's approach - combining as it does a serious cut with a tuition/financial aid package - makes an attempt at this in a very serious budgetary situation. We have excellent local legislative representatives. We must work with them to see that the State's path to brighter futures is kept clearly open.

Bruce

 

 

photo of Cofrin Libary
Office of the Chancellor
David A. Cofrin Library, Suite 810
University of Wisconsin-Green Bay
2420 Nicolet Drive
Green Bay, WI 54311-7001
Phone: 920-465-2207
Comments to:
Chancellor's Web Manager
Revised 7/31/06
E-mail: shepardb@uwgb.edu

UW-Green Bay Home


TOP OF PAGE  
Welcome Profile Staff Remarks and Essays