In 1888, Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli announced the discovery of a network of narrow lines on Mars, which he described as "canali," an Italian word that means "channels." In Italian, the word can mean a natural channel like a river valley. Schiaparelli's drawings show winding lines that look natural. Unfortunately, English speakers interpreted "canali" as "canals," which are artificial.
American Astronomer Percival Lowell became the principal champion of artificial canals and intelligent life on Mars. He claimed to have observed an elaborate network of narrow, straight lines on Mars that he believed were canals built to carry water from the polar ice caps to the equatorial regions. In many places he claimed numerous canals intersected in dark spots which he called "oases."
Even in Lowell's day, many astronomers rejected the canals. They claimed, correctly, that Mars was too cold for liquid water. Nobody ever managed to photograph a canal. We now have detailed maps of Mars, and the "canali" and canals do not exist. In fact, the "canals" run up and down slopes in many places, something real canals never do.
But Schiaparelli and Lowell were careful observers, and many of the larger objects they saw on Mars are real. So what were they seeing on Mars that they interpreted as "canali?" The question is not easy to answer because the positions of objects seen on Mars with the telescopes of 100 years ago are very inaccurate compared with locations mapped by spacecraft. They both saw the huge impact basins of Argyre, Hellas, and Isidis. On Schiaparelli's map here, the Argyre Basin is at lower left, Hellas is the large oval at lower right with the line across it, and Isidis is at extreme uppr right. They both saw the large dark regions in the southern hemisphere of Mars, although Lowell mapped only the darkest areas compared to Schiaparelli. Some of Schiaparelli's and Lowell's lines seem to correspond to the boundary between the northern lowlands and the southern highlands, and it is possible they may have been seeing shadows on sloping regions.
The story of Schiaparelli and Lowell is important. Any theory in science has to be able to be verified by other observers. It is very easy to connect random details into patterns that do not exist. Only if other people, using other methods, confirm the existence of a pattern can we say it is real.
Created 21 August 2009, Last Update 14 December 2009
Not an official UW Green Bay site