Steven Dutch, Natural and Applied Sciences,
University of Wisconsin  Green Bay
Firsttime Visitors: Please visit Site Map and Disclaimer. Use "Back" to return here.
I was first inspired to consider this problem while building a set of solids to represent all 32 crystal classes (most commercial model sets omit the less common and less symmetrical classes). I soon realized the answers were different depending on whether I was cutting models out of wood or building them out of cardboard, and whether I was thinking of ease of construction or aesthetic appeal.
Some reasonable possible definitions of "best" include:
1
Triangular prism with equilateral ends, cut obliquely to base and prism axis. Prism edges equal triangle edges. 5 faces 

1*
Rhombicfaced parallelepiped with all angles unequal and not equal to 90 degrees 6 faces 
2
Triangular prism with equilateral ends, cut normal to base and obliquely to prism axis. Prism edges equal triangle edges. 5 faces 

m
Triangular prism with equilateral ends, cut obliquely with base of triangle normal to prism axis. Prism edges equal triangle edges. 5 faces 

2/m
Rhombic prism obliquely truncated. 6 faces. 
222  
mm
Roof prism (compound of cube and triangular prism) 7 faces 

2/m 2/m 2/m
Rhombic prism with length equal to rhomb edges 6 faces 
The uniaxial classes which have a single major symmetry axis and additional twofold axes or mirror planes all have certain features in common. For each group, whether trigonal, tetragonal or hexagonal, there are seven possible classes (but some turn out to be degenerate). These can all be derived by taking one of the seven strip space groups and wrapping it around a cylinder. If N is the degree of symmetry, we have:
Highly symmetric classes are fairly easy to represent as equilateral solids but classes lacking mirror planes are quite a bit harder. One (small) class can be called skew cupolas.
At left is a regular triangular cupola. Cupolas can also be square or pentagonal. However, for hexagons the construction simply yields a flat tesselation, so only 3, 4, and 5fold cupolas exist.  
We can construct a cupola by starting with a tetrahedron and pulling the faces apart, maintaining 3fold symmetry. If we pull perpendicular to the edges we get the regular cupola above. If we pull at some other angle, we get a skew cupola as at left. The altitude of the solid is the same whether the cupola is regular or skew. We can construct 4 and 5 fold cupolas the same way starting with square or pentagonal pyramids. Again, the altitude of the solid is the same whether the cupola is regular or skew. 
However, there is a class of equilateral solids, the zonohedra, that can be a basis for finding equilateral solids of desired uniaxial symmetry, using methods analogous to those for building skew cupolas.
Zonohedra have the property that all edges belong to one of
a few sets of parallel lines. If the zonohedron has polar symmetry, it
follows that the edges are all equal and the faces are all rhombi.
At left is a zonohedron with 9fold symmetry. We can see it has mirror planes and equatorial 2fold axes, so it has symmetry 9*2m. 

We can truncate the zonohedron across any plane of vertices
normal to the axis. We get a solid with a regular polygon base.
Changing the axial proportions of the solid does not affect the parallellism or equality of the edges. Thus we can rescale the solid so that the triangular faces become equilateral. We thus get a solid with 9m symmetry. We can combine two solids base to base to get a solid with 9/m m symmetry. For large N we may have to include several bands of rhombuses. 

We can then separate faces as we did in creating skew
cupolas. At left is a polar view of the polyhedron above. At right is the
same solid expanded along the red lines, which are equal in length to all
the other edges.
The polar vertex becomes a regular 9gon and the base becomes a nonregular 18gon. The overall solid has 9fold symmetry. 
Thus we can create equilateral nfold shapes. We can combine two base to base to obtain n/m symmetry or rotate one with respect to the other to obtain n22 symmetry.
3
Skew triangular cupola. Start with a tetrahedron and pull the faces apart, maintaining 3fold symmetry. The altitude of the solid is the same whether the cupola is regular or skew. 8 faces. 

3m
Elongated trigonal prism 7 faces 

(Same as 6*)  3/m 
(Same as 6* 2/m)  3/m m 
32
Gyroelongated Triangular Bicupola (J44) 26 faces 

3*  
3*2m
General rhombohedron. Also minimal and isohedral. 6 faces 
4
Skew square cupola. Start with a square pyramid and pull the faces apart, maintaining 4fold symmetry. The altitude of the solid is the same whether the cupola is regular or skew. 10 faces. 

4/m
Paired skew square cupolas. 18 faces 

4mm
Elongated square pyramid. Also regular faced. 9 faces 

4/m 2/m 2/m
Elongated octahedron. Also regular faced. 12 faces 

422
Gyroelongated square bicupola (J45) 34 faces 

4*  
4* 2/m
Gyrobifastigium. Also regular faced. 8 faces 
6  
6/m  
6mm  
6/m 2/m 2/m
Hexagonal prism (equilateral) 8 faces 

622  
6*
Paired skew triangular cupolas 14 faces 

6* 2/m
Trigonal prism. Also minimal. 6 faces 
4/m 3* 2/m
Cube. Also isohedral, minimal and regularfaced. Other equilateral examples are the octahedron and rhombic dodecahedron, and all Archimedean polyhedra with cubic symmetry. 6 faces 

2/m 3*
Octahedron with vertices truncated by pairs of equilateral triangles such that the truncated octahedron faces become equilateral (but nonregular) hexagons. Although this solid looks flattened, its dimensions along symmetry axes are identical. 20 faces 

4* 3m
Tetrahedron. Also isohedral, minimal and regularfaced. The truncated tetrahedron (4 triangles and 4 hexagons) is another example. 4 faces 

432
Snub cube (6 squares, 32 triangles). Also regularfaced 

23 
Return to Symmetry Index
Return to Professor Dutch's Home page
Created 31 July 2001, Last Update 14 December 2009
Not an official UW Green Bay site