Information on the UTM system
Spreadsheet For UTM Conversion
Help! My Data Doesn't Look Like A UTM Grid!
I get enough inquiries on this subject that I decided to create a page for it.
Caution! Unlike latitude and longitude, there is no physical frame of reference for UTM grids. Latitude is determined by the earth's polar axis. Longitude is determined by the earth's rotation. If you can see the stars and have a sextant and a good clock set to Greenwich time, you can find your latitude and longitude. But there is no way to determine your UTM coordinates except by calculation.
UTM grids, on the other hand, are created by laying a square grid on the earth. This means that different maps will have different grids depending on the datum used (model of the shape of the earth). I saw US military maps of Germany shift their UTM grids by about 300 meters when a more modern datum was used for the maps. Also, old World War II era maps of Europe apparently used a single grid for all of Europe and grids in some areas are wildly tilted with respect to latitude and longitude.
The two basic references for converting UTM and geographic coordinates are U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1395 and U. S. Army Technical Manual TM 5-241-8 (complete citations below). Each has advantages and disadvantages.
For converting latitude and longitude to UTM, the Army publication is better. Its notation is more consistent and the formulas more clearly laid out, making code easier to debug. In defense of the USGS, their notation is constrained by space, and the need to be consistent with cartographic literature and descriptions of several dozen other map projections in the book.
For converting UTM to latitude and longitude, however, the Army publication has formulas that involve latitude (the quantity to be found) and which require reverse interpolation from tables. Here the USGS publication is the only game in town.
Some extremely tiny terms that will not seriously affect meter-scale accuracy have been omitted.
(dd + mm/60 +ss/3600) to Decimal degrees (dd.ff)
dd = whole degrees, mm = minutes, ss = seconds
dd.ff = dd + mm/60 + ss/3600
Example: 30 degrees 15 minutes 22 seconds = 30 + 15/60 + 22/3600 = 30.2561
Decimal degrees (dd.ff) to (dd + mm/60 +ss/3600)
For the reverse conversion, we want to convert dd.ff to dd mm ss. Here ff = the fractional part of a decimal degree.
mm = 60*ff
ss = 60*(fractional part of mm)
Use only the whole number part of mm in the final result.
30.2561 degrees = 30 degrees
.2561*60 = 15.366 minutes
.366 minutes = 22 seconds, so the final result is 30 degrees 15 minutes 22 seconds
Decimal degrees (dd.ff) to Radians
Radians = (dd.ff)*pi/180
Radians to Decimal degrees (dd.ff)
(dd.ff) = Radians*180/pi
Degrees, Minutes and Seconds to Distance
A degree of longitude at the equator is 111.2 kilometers. A minute is 1853 meters. A second is 30.9 meters. For other latitudes multiply by cos(lat). Distances for degrees, minutes and seconds in latitude are very similar and differ very slightly with latitude. (Before satellites, observing those differences was a principal method for determining the exact shape of the earth.)
Okay, take a deep breath. This will get very complicated, but the math, although tedious, is only algebra and trigonometry. It would sure be nice if someone wrote a spreadsheet to do this.
![]() |
P = point under consideration F = foot of perpendicular from P to the central meridian. The latitude of F is called the footprint latitude. O = origin OZ = central meridian LP = parallel of latitude of P ZP = meridian of P OL = k0S = meridional arc from equator LF = ordinate of curvature OF = N = grid northing FP = E = grid distance from central meridian GN = grid north C = convergence of meridians = angle between true and grid north |
Another thing you need to know is the datum being used:
| Datum | Equatorial Radius, meters (a) | Polar Radius, meters (b) | Flattening (a-b)/a | Use |
| NAD83/WGS84 | 6,378,137 | 6,356,752.3142 | 1/298.257223563 | Global |
| GRS 80 | 6,378,137 | 6,356,752.3141 | 1/298.257222101 | US |
| WGS72 | 6,378,135 | 6,356,750.5 | 1/298.26 | NASA, DOD |
| Australian 1965 | 6,378,160 | 6,356,774.7 | 1/298.25 | Australia |
| Krasovsky 1940 | 6,378,245 | 6,356,863.0 | 1/298.3 | Soviet Union |
| International (1924) -Hayford (1909) | 6,378,388 | 6,356,911.9 | 1/297 | Global except as listed |
| Clake 1880 | 6,378,249.1 | 6,356,514.9 | 1/293.46 | France, Africa |
| Clarke 1866 | 6,378,206.4 | 6,356,583.8 | 1/294.98 | North America |
| Airy 1830 | 6,377,563.4 | 6,356,256.9 | 1/299.32 | Great Britain |
| Bessel 1841 | 6,377,397.2 | 6,356,079.0 | 1/299.15 | Central Europe, Chile, Indonesia |
| Everest 1830 | 6,377,276.3 | 6,356,075.4 | 1/300.80 | South Asia |
Don't interpret the chart to mean there is radical disagreement about the shape of the earth. The earth isn't perfectly round and slightly different shapes work better for some regions than for the earth as a whole. The top three are based on worldwide data and are truly global. Also, you are very unlikely to find UTM grids based on any of the earlier projections.
The most modern datums (jars my Latinist sensibilities since the plural of datum in Latin is data, but that has a different meaning to us) are NAD83 and WGS84. These are based in turn on GRS80. Differences between the three systems derive mostly from redetermination of station locations rather than differences in the datum. Unless you are locating a first-order station to sub-millimeter accuracy (in which case you are way beyond the scope of this page) you can probably regard them as essentially identical.
I have no information on the NAD83 and WGS84 datums, nor can my spreadsheet calculate differences between those datums and WGS84.
These formulas are slightly modified from Army (1973). They are accurate to within less than a meter within a given grid zone.
S is the meridional arc through the point in question (the distance along the earth's surface from the equator). All angles are in radians.
The USGS gives this form, which may be more appealing to some. (They use M where the Army uses S)
All angles are in radians.
y = northing = K1 + K2p2 + K3p4, where
x = easting = K4p + K5p3, where
Easting x is relative to the central meridian. For conventional UTM easting add 500,000 meters to x.
y = northing, x = easting (relative to central meridian; subtract 500,000 from conventional UTM coordinate).
This is easy: M = y/k0.
footprint latitude fp = mu + J1sin(2mu) + J2sin(4mu) + J3sin(6mu) + J4sin(8mu), where:
lat = fp - Q1(Q2 - Q3 + Q4), where:
long = long0 + (Q5 - Q6 + Q7)/cos(fp), where:
Before linking to the program, note:
Spreadsheet For UTM Conversion
Snyder, J. P., 1987; Map Projections - A Working Manual. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1395, 383 p. If you are at all serious about maps you need this book.
Army, Department of, 1973; Universal Transverse Mercator Grid, U. S. Army Technical Manual TM 5-241-8, 64 p.
NIMA Technical Report 8350.2, "Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984, Its Definition and Relationships with Local Geodetic Systems," Second Edition, 1 September 1991 and its supplements. The report is available from the NIMA Combat Support Center and its stock number is DMATR83502WGS84. Non-DoD requesters may obtain the report as a public sale item from the U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25286, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225 or by phone at 1-800-USA-MAPS.