United States
Economic and Business History
History 322; Tues/Thurs
8-9:15 am; MAC 113
Spring 2007
Professor
Andrew E. Kersten
Office: Mary Ann
Cofrin Hall, B330
Phone: 465-2443 (leave
message)
Course Email: C5382@uwgb.edu
Email:
kerstena@uwgb.edu
Office Hours: Tues.,
Thurs., 2:00-3:00 pm
Mail:
MAC Hall B310
Description:
This course is an introduction to the economic history
of the United States. It focuses
on the rise of big business as well as the rise of organized labor in the
modern period of American history.
Students will examine the structure of the economy, the creation of
wealth and inequality, and the struggle for economic justice.
Learning Outcomes:
Coursework:
1)
Attend class every single day.
2) Take three
essay exams – two midterm and final. Each is worth 20%.
3) This
semester we are all going to write an essay about the Connor Lumber Company.
Established in 1872, the lumber company forged a unique relationship with the
Wisconsin town of Laona. Our history will be based on the companyıs records.
Each student will be assigned at least one archival box of records to read and
analyze. Then collectively we will put the story of the Connor Lumber Company
together. Assuming that our story is a good one, we will publish it in the
highly respected and successful history magazine, Voyageur. This
assignment is worth 20% of your grade.
4) Attend the
lectures of the Center for History and Social Change on April 16 (Monday, 7
pm); April 19 (Thursday, 7 pm); and April 30 (Monday, 7 pm).
Required Books:
James B. Jacobs, Mobsters, Unions, and Feds (2006)
Dan LaBotz, Cesar Chavez (2005)
Edward Levinson, Labor on the March (1995 reprint)
Andy Stern, A Country That Works (2006)
Grading:
Grades are not curved. Except in emergency situations, late work will loose
one letter grade per day without prior approval of the instructor. Attendance
will be taken and students are expected to attend class for the entire period
and are expected to contribute to discussions. Cheating constitutes a violation
of University policy and students will be subject to University disciplinary
actions.
100-93 A 92-90
AB 89-85
B 84-80
BC 79-70
C 69-60
D
Additional Rules:
As (90-100)
|
Bs (80-89)
|
Cs (70-79)
|
Ds (60-69)
|
F (59 and
below)
|
Your essay is well constructed. It has paragraphs,
topic sentences, and most importantly a clear thesis. Your essay demonstrates
a command of the material. It uses quotes from the readings. You have an
exceptional command of the English language. You avoid making many
grammatical or stylistic errors.
|
You essay is very good. It has paragraphs. You
probably need to develop your thesis and/or topic sentences. You have a fair
command of the reading materials but could have used more quotes or direct
references. You have some grammatical and stylistic problems.
|
Your essay is good. And yet, your essay needs work to
improve its structure. You need to work on your thesis and/or topic
sentences. You have a fair command of the reading materials. You could have
used more quotes. You have serious grammatical and stylistic problems.
|
Your essay lacks coherence. You make errors in essay
structure, style, and grammar. You lack a command of the reading materials.
You make many stylistic and grammatical errors. This paper needs a lot of
work.
|
You failed to complete the assignment.
|
Unit One: Mining and Miners
Jan. 16 (T): Introduction and Assigning of Connor Lumber Company Boxes
Jan. 18 (R): Labor in the Gilded Age
Jan. 23 (T): Matewan
Jan. 25 (R): Matewan
Jan. 30 (T): Harlan County, USA
Feb. 1 (R): Harlan County, USA
Unit Two: The Great Depression and the Rise of Organized Labor
Feb. 6 (T): The Economy and Labor in the 1920s and discussion of Connor
Lumber Company
Feb. 8 (R): New Deal Labor Relations
Feb. 13 (T): Levinson through page 168
Feb. 15 (R): Levinson though page 299
Feb. 20 (T): Great Depression
Feb. 22 (R): Great Depression and Review
Unit Three: Labor and Civil Rights
Feb. 27 (T): Essay Exam 1
Mar. 1 (R): Labor and Civil Rights and discussion of Connor Lumber
Company
Mar. 6 (T): 10,000 Men Named George
Mar. 8 (R): 10,000 Men Named George
Mar. 13 (T): Spring Break
Mar. 15 (R): Spring Break
Mar. 20 (T): LaBotz through page 99
Mar. 22 (R): LaBotz through 180 and Review
Unit Four: Corruption
Mar. 27 (T): The Imperfect Union
Mar. 29 (R): Hoffa
Apr. 3 (T): Hoffa
Apr. 5 (R): Putting Our Essay Together
Apr. 10 (T): Jacobs through 137
Apr. 12 (R): Jacobs through 262 and Review
Unit Five: Deindustrialization
Apr. 17 (T): Essay Exam 2
Apr. 19 (R): The Rust Belt
Apr. 24 (T): Is Walmart Good for America?
Apr. 26 (R): Stern through 98
May 1 (T): Stern through183
May 3 (R): Review and Our Essay on the Connor Lumber Company is Due
Final Exam: Thursday, May 10, 8:00-10:00 A.M.
The Connor Lumber
Company: Labor Relations in a Typical Company Town
Goals: The goals of this assignment are to learn about historical
research methods, to investigate the past using primary sources, and to write a
historical essay. We are going to write a historical essay about the Connor
Lumber Company. The companyıs records have been made available to you, and they
are located in the Cofrin Library on the 7th Floor in the Area
Research Center (CL 705). The hours of the ARC are: Monday (12:30-4:00 PM);
Tuesday (9:00 AM – 1:00 PM); Wednesday (9:00 AM – 1:00 PM);
Thursday (12:30 – 5:00 PM and 6:00 – 9:00 PM); and Friday (9:00 AM
– 1:00 PM). Your job will be to select a box or boxes of archival
material from the Connor Lumber Company. Then, on our own time, you will travel
to the ARC and read through the materials, taking a lot of notes on the form
that I have provided. Then, you will come to class and discuss the documents
you read with your group and with the class. After a period of deliberations,
we will compose together an essay based on your findings. Once again, assuming
we do a great job, this essay will be published in Voyageur Magazine.
Method:
Deadlines:
January 16 (Tuesday): Pick your boxes.
February 6 (Tuesday): You are to have most of your archival box read by
this date. We will discuss your progress in class.
March 1 (Thursday): You are to have all of your archival box read by this
date. We will discuss your findings in class.
April 5 (Thursday): You and your group are to have written your five page
segment for the class and posted it on Google Documents (you will receive email
directions on that well before this date.)
May 3 (Thursday): Your final posting on Google Documents is due on this
date for your group. Late papers will not be accepted. Also, on this date, your
group must submit a listing of your individual efforts – which boxes were
read by whom and who wrote what.
Document Worksheet
Any other distinguishing characteristics:
Notes and Quotes:
PROFESSOR KERSTENıS GUIDE TO GOOD WRITING
§
UW-GREEN BAY WRITING
POLICY
The faculty of the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay has adopted the
following writing policy for out-of-class assignments.
Acceptable Writing:
1. Clear writing is a
reflection of logical thinking; therefore, an acceptable paper must be organized. Every essay should be structured around
a thesis and supported by factual evidence and arguments that are organized in
a logical progression.
2. Writers must acknowledge
their use of data or ideas of others; therefore, an acceptable paper must have
proper documentation of all source material, following professional guidelines
such as those approved by the Modern Language Association (MLA), the American
Psychological Association (APA), or the American Association for the
Advancement of Science, or those published in a standard style manual such as
Turabian, A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations.
3. An acceptable paper must
reflect control of correct grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation.
4. An acceptable paper must be
presented in appropriate manuscript form, with errors neatly corrected and care
taken with margins, numbering of pages, spacing, and format.
Unacceptable Writing:
1. A paper without clear
organization is unacceptable.
Unclear organization includes illogical progressions from one idea to
another and the inclusion of unnecessary ideas.
2. A paper without proper
documentation is unacceptable. Failure
to acknowledge the use of another writerıs words or ideas constitutes
plagiarism. Plagiarism is both
unethical and illegal. The use of
professional editing for student papers is also unacceptable, as is the use of
purchased papers, which is also a form of plagiarism.
3. A paper containing frequent
errors in grammar, usage, spelling, or punctuation is unacceptable.
4. A paper which does not
appear to be carefully done is unacceptable. This includes papers with ragged edges, typographical errors
and strikeovers, illegible handwriting, stains, or smudges.
To achieve acceptable writing standards, students should purchase and use a
good dictionary and a writing handbook.
Assistance in improving writing skills is available through regular
courses in composition and from the Writing Center, which conducts writings
workshops and provides advice and tutoring (but not editing). All students who wish to improve their
writing are encouraged to use these resources.
§
CRITERIA FOR
EVALUATING WRITING
Listed below are some major factors that differentiate good writing from
poor writing.
This list may help you identify particular aspects of your writing that
need improvement. For further
assistance consult with instructors who are familiar with your writing skills. Writing assistance is also available in
the Writing Center (CL 109).
1. PURPOSE
Is the
purpose of your paper clear to the audience?
Is the
purpose appropriate to the assignment and to the audience?
Is the
purpose consistently maintained throughout the paper?
2. CONTENT
Are the
ideas in the paper interesting?
Do the
ideas in the paper reflect independent thought, a new approach, fresh insights?
Is the
writer actively engaged with the topic?
3. ORGANIZATION
Are the
ideas developed in a logical order?
Is the
organizational pattern clear to the readers?
Is the
discussion coherent? Are
transitional devices used effectively to shift smoothly from one idea to
another?
4. DEVELOPMENT
Are the
major ideas adequately supported with examples, specific details, and other
kinds of evidence?
Are the
ideas presented in meaningful paragraphs?
Is there a
general sense of completeness and closure?
5. WORDS: CHOICE AND ARRANGEMENT
Have clear, precise,
and appropriate words been selected?
Have cliches
been avoided?
Have the
words been arranged into correct and graceful sentences?
6. STYLE AND TONE
Is the style clear,
lively, fluent?
Is the tone
appropriate for the purpose and audience?
Are the
sentences varied in length and structure?
Is there
appropriate use of metaphor, analogy, parallelism, and other rhetorical
devices?
7. TECHNICAL QUALITIES: MECHANICS
Does the
writing conform to the conventions of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and
usage?
Is the
format of the paper appropriate to the assignment?
Has all
material from other sources been properly documented?
Has the
paper been carefully proofread, with all typos neatly corrected?
EXTRA TIPS
FROM KINDLY PROFESSOR KERSTEN
General Suggestions
Start early.
Have a friend read your early drafts.
Format
Staple your papers including your documents.
No coversheets.
No plastic covers or folders.
Always use page numbers.
Use footnotes, endnotes, or in paragraph citation.
Style -- avoid these problems
AFW Avoid
Flavoring Words (³very² etc)
AWK Awkward
Sentence Structure
COLL Colloquial
Language
DA Donıt
Abbreviate
DP Dangling
Preposition
DUC Donıt
Use Contractions
DUF Donıt
Use First Person
DWQ Donıt
Write in Questions
KPP Keep
the Past in the Past (use past tense verbs)
MU Meaning
Unclear
MVT Mixed
Verb Tenses
NAS Not
A Sentence
NSB Donıt
Use History as Your Personal Soap Box
PV Passive
Voice
RSS Repetitive
Sentence Structure
SC Use
Standard Rules of Capitalization
SP Misspelled
Word
TAS Throw-away
sentence (has no meaning)
TL Sentence,
Paragraph, or Quote is Too Long
W Wordy
WW Wrong
Word
Documentation
For all documentation questions, refer to Turabian. If you do not own a copy, it is worth the
price.
Here are some common formats.
FOOTNOTES and ENDNOTES:
Published
1Andrew E. Kersten, Race, Jobs, and the War: The FEPC in the
Midwest, 1941-1946 (Urbana:
University of Illinois Press, 2000), 1-5.
2Andrew E. Kersten, ³Jobs and Justice: The FEPC in the Motor
City,² Michigan Historical Review 56 (Spring 1999): 1-25.
3 Andrew E. Kersten, ed., Reach or Breech: The State and
Society, 1865-1945 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2001): 25-50.
4 Andrew E. Kersten, ³Willie Webb,² in Ordinary Women,
ed. Kriste Lindenmeyer (New York: Scholarly Resources, 2000): 50-55.
GENERAL RULE: NAME (FIRST, MIDDLE, LAST), TITLE, PLACE IF BOOK,
VOLUME IF JOURNAL, DATE, PAGES.
Unpublished
3Letter, Andrew E. Kersten to Bethany R. Kersten, 27 May 1997,
Andrew E. Kersten Papers, Box 15, Folder 9, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay
Archives.
GENERAL RULE: KIND OF DOCUMENT, TITLE, DATE, COLLECTION, LOCATION
WITHIN COLLECTION, PLACE OF COLLECTION.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Kersten, Andrew E.
³Jobs and Justice: The FEPC in the Motor City.² Michigan Historical Review
(Spring 1999): 1-25.
Kersten, Andrew E. Race,
Jobs, and the War: The FEPC in the Midwest, 1941-1946. Urbana: University
of Illinois Press, 2000.
Same general rules
above but put last names first.
Always separate your primary and secondary material in your
bibliography. Questions? See me or use Turabian.
Tips:
1) Be consistent and thorough.
2) In your bibliography, separate primary and
secondary sources.