Task Force on Teaching Evaluation - Bibliography

Background | Recommendations | Process | Overview | Bibliography |Appendices

(1) Copy in the Office of Testing Services

(2) Copy in the Cofrin Library

Angelo, T.A., & Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (1)

Bason, S. A. (January 1994). Student ratings of professor are not gender blind, AERA-C Division C: Learning and Instruction Discussion List [Online]. Available by E-mail: AERA-C@ASUACAD.BITNET

Berquist, W.H., & Phillips, S.R. (1977). A handbook for faculty development, Vol. 2. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Sounding Press.

Braskamp, L.A., & Ory, J.C. (1994). Assessing faculty work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (2)

Brent, R. & Felder, R.M. (1997). It takes one to know one. Chemical Engineering Education, 31, 32-33. (1)

Broder, J.M. & Taylor, W.J. (1994). Teaching evaluation in agricultural economics and related departments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76. (1)

Centra, J.A. (1972). Evaluating college teaching: The rhetoric and the research. In D.W. Vermilye (Ed.), The Expanded Campus. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (1)

Centra, J.A. (1979). Determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (2)

Centra, J.A. (1987). A guide to evaluating teaching for promotion and tenure. Akron, MA: Copley Publishing Group.

Centra, J.A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (1)

Cohen, S.R. (1997, September). The mismeasure of the college professor. College Student Journal, 31, 293-300. (1)

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998, February). Standards for assessing teaching effectiveness are key. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 471-472. (1)

DiLorenzo, T.M. & Heppner, P.P. (1994). The role of an academic department in promoting faculty development: Recognizing diversity and leading to excellence. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 5. (1)

Edgerton, R. (1991). The teaching portfolio as a display of best work. Paper presented at the National Conference of the American Association of Higher Education,Washington, D.C.

England, J. (1996). How evaluations of teaching are used in personnel decisions, American Council of Learned Societies, Occasional Paper No. 33 [Online]. Available: http://www.acls.org/acls/op33.htm [1997, November 26]. (1)

Felder, R.M. (1992). What do they know anyway? Chemical Engineering Education, 26, 134-135. (1)

Felder, R.M. & Brent, R. (1996). If you've got it, flaunt it: Uses and abuses of teaching portfolios. Chemical Engineering Education, 30, 188-189. (1)

Feldman, K. A. (1976). Grades and college students'evaluations of their courses and teachers. Research in Higher Education, 4, 69-111.

Feldman, K. A. (1997). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice, 368-395. New York: Agathon Press.

Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997a). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 743-751. (1)

Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997b). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209-1217.

Haskell, R.E. (1997). Academic freedom, tenure, and student evaluation of faculty: Galloping polls in the 21st century, Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 5, No. 6 [Online]. Available: http://www.bus.lsu.edu/accounting/faculty/lcrumbley/educpoly.htm [1997, November 26]. (1)

Hutchings, P. (1996). The peer collaboration and review of teaching, American Council of Learned Societies, Occasional Paper No. 33 [Online]. Available: http://www.acls.org/acls/op33.htm [1997, November 26]. (1)

McKeachie, W.H. (1996). Student ratings of teaching, American Council of Learned Societies, Occasional Paper No. 33 [Online]. Available: http://www.acls.org/acls/op33.htm [1997, November 26]. (1)

Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L.A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52, 1187-1197.

Miller, R. I. (1987). Evaluating faculty for promotion and tenure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (2)

National Council on Measurement in Education (1981). Handbook of teacher evaluation. J. Millman (ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. (1)

Nwagwu, E.C. (1998, January-February). How community college administrators can improve teaching effectiveness. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 22, 11-20. (1)

Osborne, J.L. (1998, Winter). Integrating student and peer evaluation of teaching. College Teaching, 46, 36-38.

Seldin, P. (1987). Evaluating teaching performance. Workshop presented at the University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

Seldin, P. (1989). The teaching portfolio. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, Jekyll Island, GA.

Seldin, P. (1991). The teaching portfolio. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company. (1)

Seldin, P. (1993). Successful use of teaching portfolios. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company. (2)

Seldin, P. & Angelo, T. (1997). Evaluating teaching performance: When will we ever learn to use what we know? NUTN Video conference, November 14, 1997. (1)

Shore, B.M. (1986). The teaching dossier (rev. ed.). Montreal, CA: Canadian Association of University Teachers.

Sorcinelli, M.D. (1986). Evaluation of teaching handbook. Bloomington, IN: Dean of Faculties Office, Indiana University.

(Stanford University) Subcommittee on the Evaluation and Improvement of Teaching (1995). Final report. Stanford University Portfolio [Online]. Available: http://portfolio.stanford.edu/105099 [1997, November 26]. (1)

Styer, D. (1997, June 18). The evaluation of teaching [Online]. Available: http://www.physics.oberlin.edu/~dstyer/EvaluationOfTeaching.html [1998, November 24]. (1)

University of California (1980, February). Report of the task force on teaching evaluation, 1-163. (1)

University of North Carolina (UNC). (No date). Intercampus Dialogue on Peer Review of Teaching [Online]. Available: [1997, November 26]. (1)

University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (1980, June 17). The evaluation of teaching at the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay: A final report, Select Committee on Teaching Evaluation, 1-35. (1)

University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (1989, 1980, 1976). Policy on student evaluation of instruction, UW-Green Bay Faculty Governance Handbook, 64-65. (1)

University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (1993). Guidelines for tenured faculty review and development, UW-Green Bay Faculty Governance Handbook, 71-73. (1)

University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (1995, May 10). Policy on student feedback on instruction, Expectations for Learning, Faculty Senate [Online]. Available: http://www.UW-Green Bay.edu/~secfac/handbook.htm (1)

University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (1995, October 31). Expectations for tenure, Personnel Council memorandum. (1)

University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (1996, July 31). Principles of good practice for the assessment of teaching, Office of Testing Services document. (1)

University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (1997, September 25). Guidelines for the preparation of materials in support of candidates for promotion to full professor rank, Committee of Six Full Professors [E-mail]. (1)

University of Wisconsin System (1974, October 4). Policy on student evaluation of instruction, Board of Regents, Resolution #868, 1-5. (1)

University of Wisconsin System (1994). Accountability for achievement: 1994 report on UW System accountability indicators, UW System Administration, 1-3. (1)

Vavrus, L.G., & Calfee, R.C. (1988). Paper presented at the National Reading Conference,Tucson, AZ.

Weimer, M.E. (1990). Improving college teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

York University Senate Committee on Teaching and Learning (SCOTL). (No date). Teaching Evaluation Guide [Online]. Available: http://www.yorku.ca/admin/cst/sc1.html [1997, November 26]. (1)

York University Senate Committee on Teaching and Learning (SCOTL). (No date). Teaching Documentation Guide [Online]. Available: http://foxglove.ccs.yorku.ca/admin/univsec/sen_comm/scotl/tdguide.htm [1998, June 19]. (1)