Office of the Provost

AAPC - Newsletter, April 2005

A Note from the Provost
Confronting the Governor's Budget
Creating Innovative Solutions: Summer School 2005

A Note from the Provost

At the UW-Green Bay alumni awards banquet last week, I had the privilege of hearing five outstanding alumni reflect on their UWGB education and what it has meant for them. One comment particularly stands out for me. It was from Distinguished Alumni Award winner William Hanrahan, Wisconsin Assistant Attorney General and a 1982 graduate of UWGB’s Urban and Regional Studies program. Recalling his days at UWGB, Mr. Hanrahan said what made UWGB so exciting was the spirit of innovation, that:

“UWGB’s faculty and the curriculum were out of the box before ‘out of the box’ was even a phrase.”

That made me wonder, are we still “out of the box”? Long after we retire, will we recall UWGB as fostering creativity and experimentation? Long after they’ve graduated, will our current students say their UWGB faculty and curriculum were “out of the box”?

What does this have to do with strategic planning? Some regard planning as an exercise to “pin everything down,” to remove ambiguities and make everything predictable. For those folk, policies, procedures, and planning are important to keep things from happening unless they are 100% sure that the new development is “proper,” guaranteed to work, clearly prescribed by prior planning work.

Others pursue strategic planning as a means of ensuring agility, innovation, and experimentation in keeping with changing conditions and opportunities. I’m in that camp. For me, policies, procedures, and planning should help us navigate in changing waters. They should empower us to work together and individually, and to adjust and experiment as we go. We agree on the “big picture” goals and objectives we want to accomplish, then we are free to use our creativity and individual initiative to move in that direction.

We will be challenged by the unexpected – both positive and negative. But whether we are confronted by negative challenges to address (like the recent budget reductions) or positive opportunities to explore and experiment with, our planning process should help us navigate intelligently and intentionally for the common good. In other words, to “confront the emerging challenges, control the issues, and create innovative solutions.”

If we are successful, future alumni and retirees will recall their years at UWGB much as Distinguished Alumnus Hanrahan did – as creative, experimenting, and “out of the box”?

I wish you all a successful conclusion to the Spring semester and a wonderful summer. As always, we welcome your comments, questions, or suggestions.

Sue K. Hammersmith, Provost

Confronting the Governor's Budget

The Governor’s budget proposal for 2005-07 calls for the UW System to make significant budget reductions, including the elimination of 200 positions. UW-Green Bay was given targets for reducing our state-supported budget and personnel proportionate to our share of the total state support for the UW system. In the Provost’s area, our budget divisions heads worked together, as a team, to develop budget-reduction recommendations guided by the ongoing work of the Academic Affairs Planning Committee (AAPC). Did the AAPC’s prior planning work affect our discussions? Absolutely!

  • AAPC provided focus. As a result, we quickly decided that reductions would not be allocated “across-the-board” (as they were 2 years ago) but rather would be focused and targeted.
  • AAPC discussions provided a common ground for the division heads to understand each other’s priorities as well as our shared priorities. Our reduction discussions were guided by our shared concern for the common good rather than individual, competitive “turf.” As a result, our budget discussions were much more efficient and productive than they were two years ago.
  • Our prior planning gave us a reference point against which to evaluate alternative reduction proposals. We reviewed the SBC forms submitted earlier to make sure that our proposed reductions were in line with those goals as much as possible.
  • Finally, AAPC’s prior planning decisions determined what areas would not be considered for budget reductions. The Institute for Research and Outreach, for example, are both essential to enhancing and diversifying our revenues. Hence, they were not subjected to reductions.
    Our discussions were guided by this question:

Of all the high-quality, efficient operations we have, which functions could be reduced or eliminated with the least effect on our students, faculty, staff, and planning goals?

The decisions were still difficult, but at least they were guided by a confident eye to the future and where we want to be five years from now. Make no mistake, the slated budget reductions will have effects and some of those effects will be negative. But not random, and not fatal.

This illustrates how planning helps us cope with the unexpected, as well as with events and issues we can anticipate.

As a result of AAPC discussions last semester, Dean Erickson, Dean Hughes, and Associate Dean Salisbury worked with the academic units and offices across campus to make UWGB’s 2005 Summer Session more entrepreneurial, more responsive to market needs, and more profitable. They developed an innovative and flexible business model for handling tuition revenue and instructional expenses. They put together a market-sensitive array of summer courses. And they engaged in a creative, public relations/recruitment campaign to increase enrollments.

To date, we see a dramatic increase in enrollments (both head count and student credit hours). Of course, instructional expenses will also be higher because we are offering many more classes. As a result, we won’t know the final fiscal impact of this new summer school model until later in the summer.

The summer enrollments continue to grow, as registration is still open. The recruitment campaign will include two additional groups who have not yet registered: incoming freshmen, and Green Bay area students who attend college elsewhere but will be home for the summer. As an early indication of success, though, this is how the Summer 2005 enrollments and projected tuition to date (April 22, 2005) compare with the final enrollments and tuition revenues from Summer 2004:

Indicator 2004 (final) 2005 (to date) Difference Change
Enrolled person 1,281 1,716 435 +34%
Student credit hours ,3922 5,293 1,371 +35%
Tuition $595,000 $886,000 $291,000 +49%

Clearly, both enrollments and tuition revenue will be up this year. So will expenses. We won’t know until much later what the impact will be on our actual net revenues. One thing is certain:

This experiment shows a previously untapped potential for growing our summer school.

We will continue to monitor enrollments, revenues, and expenses throughout the summer. We will incorporate what we learn into planning for Summer 2006, as we continue to “confront the challenges, control the issues, and create innovative solutions.”

Creating Innovative Solutions: Summer School 2005

The AAPC has identified five goals to guide Academic Affairs Area planning and budgeting in the coming year. Each of our budget divisions will be asked to address these goals in its planning discussions, activities, and budget proposals for the coming year. (Our budget divisions are Information Services, Liberal Arts and Sciences, Outreach and Adult Access, Professional and Graduate Programs, Student Affairs, and the Provost’s Office.) Those goals can be summarized as follows:

  • Offer interdisciplinary, problem-focused programs that are flexible and responsive to the needs of the region and marketplace.
  • Promote a campus culture of learning, professional development, and continuous quality improvement across all units.
  • Promote productive and responsive partnerships.
  • Prepare students, staff, and faculty to function as responsible citizens of the world.
  • Achieve sustainable resources sufficient to sustain and carry out our mission.

AAPC is currently considering the more specific objectives that can be pursued for each of these goals, as well as what information and performance indicators we should track to monitor how well we are doing with respect to each goal. Before the semester ends, AAPC will circulate to the entire campus a working draft of our goals, the major objectives for each goal, and the performance indicators that we will use to monitor progress toward achieving each goal. We will welcome feedback, suggestions, and comments.

Over the summer, our budget divisions will begin to incorporate these goals and objectives, as applicable, into their planning for the coming year. Information Services, Outreach, Student Services, and the Provost’s Office all have planning retreats over the summer, and these will provide an opportunity for broad-based discussion within those units. In Liberal Arts and Sciences and in Professional and Graduate Studies, the deans will work with their planning committees to prepare for fuller discussions when the faculty reconvene in the fall. We also will continue to monitor and evaluate innovations which are already underway – e.g., the new summer school model – and will incorporate what we learn from experience into our planning for the future.

The results of all this will guide our planning and budgetary decisions in the coming year.

By incorporating planning as part of a year-round cycle, by continually monitoring our performance with respect to our goals and objectives, and by actively connecting planning and budgeting, we will be in a much better position to seize control of our future, to effect and manage change, and to deal with conditions, issues, and opportunities as they arise.

Again, before the semester ends, AAPC will circulate a set of goals, objectives, and performance measures. We look forward to campus discussion, feedback, and creativity as we move forward with this.