Technology Council 2004/05 Annual Report
Kathy Pletcher, Chair, Technology Council
Purpose & Membership
The Technology Council is advisory to the Provost and responsible for developing and monitoring the campus technology plan and recommending technology policies. The Council is chaired by the Associate Provost of Information Services. Membership consists of representatives from each of the divisions, three faculty members, and one student.
Members for 2004/05 were:
- Academic Affairs – Tim Sewall
- Advancement – Scott Hildebrand
- Athletics – Dan McGiver
- Business & Finance – Sharon Dimmer
- Faculty Representatives - Colleen Fitzpatrick, Steve Dutch, Art Lacy
- Information Services – David Kieper
- Liberal Arts & Sciences – Fergus Hughes (Joyce Salisbury)
- Outreach & Extension - Jan Thornton
- Planning & Budget - Dean Rodeheaver
- Professional & Graduate Studies - Fritz Erickson (Mike Marinetti)
- Student Affairs – Sue Keihn
- Student Representative - Adam Ruechel
- Chair – Kathy Pletcher
Activities for 2004/05
- Developed draft Technology Plan 2010, met with governance groups, held open forums and created a website for Technology Council to assist with dissemination of and gather input for the plan, September – November
- Approved Technology Plan 2010, December
- Reviewed and Approved Academic Computer Lab Plans for 2005/06, December
- Approved Disposal and Surplus Handling of Computers and Electronic Devices , February
- Updated charge and membership to add a representative from Athletics, Feburary
- Approved revisions to Acceptable Use Policy, March
- Reviewed guidelines for email distribution lists. Council upheld current guidelines and directed authorized users to abide by guidelines.
- Reviewed lab usage data and agreed on general utilization rates for sustainable labs. Utilization rates of 40%-50% were considered optimal for open labs and 20%-30% utilization rates were considered optimal for teaching labs. Labs with utilization rates of 60% or more may warrant additional workstations. Labs with utilization rates of less than 10% should be reviewed for reduction or elimination. The LAS Dean was asked to meet with faculty users to rank the importance of computer labs relative to other instructional technology needs and report back to Council in October 2005, April
- Sponsored Annual Technology Forum, April 27
- Approved Guidelines for Academic Web Sites, May
|